San Bushmen of the Kalahari Desert

The San Bushwork force of the Kalahari Desert A well-known foraging community in the southwest region of Africa is the San Bushmen. These hunting and gathering bands work lived in the Kalahari Desert region for thousands of years. The men of these communities ar the primary hunters, who provide about 20 percent of the diet from the animals they kill. The women collect a miscellaneous nuts, tubers, melons, and berries that provide the other 80 percent of the San diet (Nowak & Laird, 2010).The San live in one of the most fringy environments in the world and generally move around in bands when hunting or while abject around to find body of water or food about two to three ms a week. Women put up collect enough food in one day to feed their families for a beneficial week, while men hunt two or three days a week. Vegetation is arrange in the same place every year, whereas animals are less reliably found in a particular location. Thus, womens knowledge about reliable locations t o find food is respected and seriously considered.The rest of the time is spent in leisurely pursuits visiting, playing, sleeping, and just enjoying each others company (Lee, 1979). Like other foragers, have umpteen hours of free time for leisure activities, including socializing with their kin and friends. San men vary widely in their attainment at hunting, but different levels of success do not lead to differences in status. Self-deprecation and understatement are stringently required of the hunter after a successful hunt. This modesty is evident from the moment he enters the liquidation to relay his news.Although an energetic man might be a successful hunter, he is the owner of the centerfield only if the spear or cursor utilize to kill the animal was his. A man who does not excel at hunting can therefore be successful by giving an arrow he made to another hunter. If his arrow was used in the kill, he is considered the owner of the meat (Shostak, 1981). When flavor general ized reciprocity from the outside, one would think a hunter, who chooses to share his kill among others is being very generous. However, the genuine reason behind this is that it enhances their survival. Without collectively sharing, the San conduct would be much harder.This way of life helps relieve tensions and strengthens their bonds of kinship. reciprocity helps foragers in the way of a safety net. If a community loses a food or water source, they can ask another community to share theirs. As far as ownership is concerned, the San, have rights to waterholes, and if others want to use the waterhole, they must get permission. By sharing the use of the waterhole, the community receiving the water leave behind reciprocate in the future with other goods or services. Other forms of ownership include tools, such as blowpipes, darts, digging sticks, and animals.Today, the San are having trouble maintaining their identity, their traditions and their cultures. The land that was once f ree to them is being taken away and used for game reserves and other purposes. Forcing them to move from their lands disrupts and weakens their kinship. Kinship in todays society can go either way. It can be cohesive or disconnected due to the nature or patterns of how the relationship was built. If a child for instance had a great relationship with his/her family while growing up, they are more likely to have a great relationship throughout their lives and continue respecting their family and others.If the opposite applies, as it unfortunately happens in todays world, they grow up to believe that they are an island and if they do not take care of themselves, no one else will. References Nowak, B. , & Laird, P. (2010). Cultural anthropology. San Diego, Bridgepoint Education, Inc. https//content. ashford. edu. Lee, R. (1979). The Kung San Men, women and work in a foraging society. Melbourne, Australia Cambridge University Press. Shostak, M. (1981). Nisa The life and words of a Kung woman. New York Vintage.